Gov’t. Continues to Garnish Tax Refunds to Recoup Student Loan Debt Despite CARES Act Directive, Lawsuit Claims

Student Loan Defense Center Hit with Class Action Over Alleged Robocalls

Student Loan Defense Center LLC faces a proposed class motion over its alleged apply of putting automated telemarketing calls to customers who by no means consented to obtain them.

According to the case, the Student Loan Defense Center’s use of a man-made or prerecorded voice to market and promote its enterprise by unsolicited telemarketing calls is a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, a federal legislation that prohibits the usage of such know-how to position non-emergency telemarketing calls with no recipient’s prior categorical consent to take action.

The plaintiff, a Montgomery County, Maryland resident, claims the Student Loan Defense Center, who purports to assist customers cut back or get rid of student loan debt, referred to as him on not less than two events in June 2021 and left voicemails that contained the next prerecorded message:

“Hi this is Thomas from Student Loan Defense Center it looks like we have on record that your federal student loan maybe eligible to be reduced or even eliminated. So, give us a call us at 702-854-1378.”

Per the criticism, the plaintiff was capable of inform that the calls utilized a man-made or prerecorded voice “because the caller was robotic and because of the distinctive nature of the sound, pauses, and the wording of the recordings were always the same.”

The plaintiff claims to have by no means offered the defendant together with his cellphone quantity or his permission to position the unsolicited calls. According to the case, the person by no means signed up for Student Loan Defense Center’s providers or “had any form of business relationship” with the corporate.

READ:   Deferred Payment Loan Calculator

Moreover, the plaintiff’s cellphone quantity has allegedly been registered on the National Do Not Call Registry since November 2006, which means the defendant was prohibited from calling his quantity with out his categorical written consent, in response to the go well with.

The lawsuit claims that other than experiencing privateness violations, the plaintiff has turn into “understandably aggravated” with the defendant’s calls, which have allegedly compelled him to redirect his consideration from work and different actions and spend time investigating the supply of the messages.

Get class motion lawsuit information despatched to your inbox – join ClassAction.org’s e-newsletter right here.