Edward I of England - Wikipedia

Edward I of England – Wikipedia

King of England from 1272 to 1307

King of England

Edward I
Half figure of Edward facing left with short, curly hair and a hint of beard. He wears a coronet and holds a sceptre in his right hand. He has a blue robe over a red tunic, and his hands are covered by white, embroidered gloves. His left hand seems to be pointing left, to something outside the picture.

Portrait in Westminster Abbey, considered of Edward I

Reign 20 November 1272 – 7 July 1307
Coronation 19 August 1274
Predecessor Henry III
Successor Edward II
Born Night of 17/18 June 1239
Palace of Westminster, London, England
Died 7 July 1307(1307-07-07) (aged 68)
Burgh by Sands, Cumberland, England
Burial 27 October 1307
Spouse
Issue
amongst others
Henry
Eleanor, Countess of Bar
Joan, Countess of Hertford
Alphonso, Earl of Chester
Margaret, Duchess of Brabant
Mary of Woodstock
Elizabeth, Countess of Hereford
Edward II, King of England
Thomas, Earl of Norfolk
Edmund, Earl of Kent
House Plantagenet
Father Henry III of England
Mother Eleanor of Provence

Edward I (17/18 June 1239 – 7 July 1307), also referred to as Edward Longshanks and the Hammer of the Scots (Latin: Malleus Scotorum), was King of England from 1272 to 1307. Before his accession to the throne, he was generally known as The Lord Edward. The first son of Henry III, Edward was concerned from an early age within the political intrigues of his father’s reign, which included an outright insurrection by the English barons. In 1259, he briefly sided with a baronial reform motion, supporting the Provisions of Oxford. After reconciliation together with his father, nevertheless, he remained loyal all through the following armed battle, referred to as the Second Barons’ War. After the Battle of Lewes, Edward was hostage to the rebellious barons, however escaped after just a few months and defeated the baronial chief Simon de Montfort on the Battle of Evesham in 1265. Within two years the insurrection was extinguished and, with England pacified, Edward joined the Ninth Crusade to the Holy Land. He was on his manner house in 1272 when he was knowledgeable that his father had died. Making a sluggish return, he reached England in 1274 and was topped at Westminster Abbey.

Edward spent a lot of his reign reforming royal administration and customary legislation. Through an intensive authorized inquiry, he investigated the tenure of assorted feudal liberties, whereas the legislation was reformed via a collection of statutes regulating felony and property legislation. Increasingly, nevertheless, Edward’s consideration was drawn in the direction of army affairs. After suppressing a minor insurrection in Wales in 1276–77, Edward responded to a second insurrection in 1282–83 with a full-scale warfare of conquest. After a profitable marketing campaign, he subjected Wales to English rule, constructed a collection of castles and cities within the countryside and settled them with English folks. Next, his efforts have been directed in the direction of the Kingdom of Scotland. Initially invited to arbitrate a succession dispute, Edward claimed feudal suzerainty over Scotland. The warfare that adopted continued after Edward’s demise, despite the fact that the English appeared victorious at a number of factors. Simultaneously, Edward discovered himself at warfare with France (a Scottish ally) after King Philip IV of France had confiscated the Duchy of Gascony, which till then had been held in private union with the Kingdom of England. Although Edward recovered his duchy, this battle relieved English army stress in opposition to Scotland. At the identical time there have been issues at house. In the mid-1290s, in depth army campaigns required excessive ranges of taxation, and Edward met with each lay and ecclesiastical opposition. These crises have been initially averted, however points remained unsettled. When the King died in 1307, he left to his son Edward II an ongoing warfare with Scotland and lots of monetary and political issues.

Edward I used to be a tall man for his period, at 6 ft 2 in (1.88 m), therefore the nickname “Longshanks”. He was temperamental, and this, alongside together with his top, made him an intimidating man, and he usually instilled concern in his contemporaries. Nevertheless, he held the respect of his topics for the way in which he embodied the medieval very best of kingship, as a soldier, an administrator, and a person of religion. Modern historians are divided on their evaluation of Edward: whereas some have praised him for his contribution to the legislation and administration, others have criticised him for his uncompromising angle in the direction of his the Aristocracy. Currently, Edward I is credited with many accomplishments throughout his reign, together with restoring royal authority after the reign of Henry III, establishing Parliament as a everlasting establishment and thereby additionally a useful system for elevating taxes, and reforming the legislation via statutes. At the identical time, he’s additionally usually criticised for different actions, reminiscent of his brutal conduct in the direction of the Welsh and Scots, and issuing the Edict of Expulsion in 1290, by which the Jews have been expelled from England. The Edict remained in impact for the remainder of the Middle Ages, and it was over 350 years till it was formally overturned below Oliver Cromwell in 1657.

Early years, 1239–1263[edit]

Childhood and marriage[edit]

Inside an initial letter are drawn two heads with necks, a male over a female. They are both wearing coronets. The man's left eye is drawn different both from his right and those of the woman.

Early fourteenth-century manuscript preliminary exhibiting Edward and his spouse Eleanor of Castile. The artist has maybe tried to depict Edward’s blepharoptosis (drooping eyelid), a trait he inherited from his father.[2]

Edward was born on the Palace of Westminster on the evening of 17–18 June 1239, to King Henry III and Eleanor of Provence.[3][a]Edward is an Anglo-Saxon title, and was not generally given among the many aristocracy of England after the Norman conquest, however Henry was dedicated to the veneration of Edward the Confessor, and determined to call his firstborn son after the saint.[4][b] Among his childhood mates was his cousin Henry of Almain, son of King Henry’s brother Richard of Cornwall.[6] Henry of Almain remained a detailed companion of the prince, each via the civil warfare that adopted, and later in the course of the campaign.[7] Edward was within the care of Hugh Giffard – father of the long run Chancellor Godfrey Giffard – till Bartholomew Pecche took over at Giffard’s demise in 1246.[8]

There have been considerations about Edward’s well being as a baby, and he fell unwell in 1246, 1247, and 1251.[6] Nonetheless, he grew to become an imposing man; at 6 ft 2 in (188 cm) he towered over most of his contemporaries, and therefore maybe his epithet “Longshanks”, which means “long legs” or “long shins”. The historian Michael Prestwich states that his “long arms gave him an advantage as a swordsman, long thighs one as a horseman. In youth, his curly hair was blond; in maturity it darkened, and in old age it turned white. [His features were marred by a drooping left eyelid.] His speech, despite a lisp, was said to be persuasive.”[9][10]

In 1254 English fears of a Castilian invasion of the English province of Gascony induced King Henry to rearrange a politically expedient marriage between fifteen-year-old Edward and thirteen-year-old Eleanor, the half-sister of King Alfonso X of Castile.[11] They have been married on 1 November 1254 within the Abbey of Santa María la Real de Las Huelgas in Castile.[12] As a part of the wedding settlement, Edward obtained grants of land price 15,000 marks a yr.[13] Although the endowments King Henry made have been sizeable, they supplied Edward little independence. He had already obtained Gascony as early as 1249, however Simon de Montfort, sixth Earl of Leicester, had been appointed as royal lieutenant the yr earlier than and, consequently, drew its earnings, so in apply Edward derived neither authority nor income from this province.[14] The grant he obtained in 1254 included most of Ireland, and far land in Wales and England, together with the earldom of Chester, however King Henry retained a lot management over the land in query, significantly in Ireland, so Edward’s energy was restricted there as effectively, and the King derived many of the earnings from these lands.[15]

From 1254 to 1257, Edward was below the affect of his mom’s kin, referred to as the Savoyards,[16] essentially the most notable of whom was Peter II of Savoy, the Queen’s uncle.[17] After 1257, Edward more and more fell in with the Poitevin or Lusignan faction – the half-brothers of his father Henry III – led by such males as William de Valence.[18][c] This affiliation was vital, as a result of the 2 teams of privileged foreigners have been resented by the established English aristocracy, and they might be on the centre of the following years’ baronial reform motion.[20] There have been tales of unruly and violent conduct by Edward and his Lusignan kinsmen, which raised questions on Edward’s private qualities. The subsequent years could be formative on his character.[21]

Early ambitions[edit]

Edward had proven independence in political issues as early as 1255, when he sided with the Soler household in Gascony, within the ongoing battle between the Soler and Colomb households. This ran opposite to his father’s coverage of mediation between the native factions.[22] In May 1258, a gaggle of magnates drew up a doc for reform of the King’s authorities – the so-called Provisions of Oxford – largely directed in opposition to the Lusignans. Edward stood by his political allies and strongly opposed the Provisions. The reform motion succeeded in limiting the Lusignan affect, nevertheless, and progressively Edward’s angle began to alter. In March 1259, he entered into a proper alliance with one of many most important reformers, Richard de Clare, sixth Earl of Gloucester. Then, on 15 October 1259, he introduced that he supported the barons’ targets, and their chief, Simon de Montfort.[23]

The motive behind Edward’s change of coronary heart may have been purely pragmatic; Montfort was in place to help his trigger in Gascony.[24] When the King left for France in November, Edward’s behaviour was pure insubordination. He made a number of appointments to advance the reason for the reformers, inflicting his father to imagine that Edward was contemplating a coup d’état.[25] When the King returned from France, he initially refused to see his son, however via the mediation of the Earl of Cornwall and Boniface, Archbishop of Canterbury, the 2 have been finally reconciled.[26] Edward was despatched overseas, and in November 1260 he once more united with the Lusignans, who had been exiled to France.[27]

Back in England, early in 1262, Edward fell out with a few of his former Lusignan allies over monetary issues. The subsequent yr, King Henry despatched him on a marketing campaign in Wales in opposition to Llywelyn ap Gruffudd, with solely restricted outcomes.[28] Around the identical time, Montfort, who had been in a foreign country since 1261, returned to England and reignited the baronial reform motion.[29] It was at this pivotal second, because the King appeared able to resign to the barons’ calls for, that Edward started to take management of the scenario. Whereas he had thus far been unpredictable and equivocating, from this level on he remained firmly dedicated to defending his father’s royal rights.[30] He reunited with a number of the males he had alienated the yr earlier than – amongst them his childhood buddy, Henry of Almain, and John de Warenne, sixth Earl of Surrey – and retook Windsor Castle from the rebels.[31] Through the arbitration of King Louis IX of France, an settlement was made between the 2 events. This so-called Mise of Amiens was largely beneficial to the royalist aspect, and laid the seeds for additional battle.[32]

Civil warfare and crusades, 1264–1273[edit]

Second Barons’ War[edit]

The years 1264–1267 noticed the battle referred to as the Second Barons’ War, by which baronial forces led by Simon de Montfort fought in opposition to those that remained loyal to the King. The first scene of battle was town of Gloucester, which Edward managed to retake from the enemy. When Robert de Ferrers, sixth Earl of Derby, got here to the help of the rebels, Edward negotiated a truce with the Earl, the phrases of which Edward later broke. He then captured Northampton from Simon de Montfort the Younger earlier than embarking on a retaliatory marketing campaign in opposition to Derby’s lands.[33] The baronial and royalist forces lastly met on the Battle of Lewes, on 14 May 1264. Edward, commanding the correct wing, carried out effectively, and shortly defeated the London contingent of Montfort’s forces. Unwisely, nevertheless, he adopted the scattered enemy in pursuit, and on his return discovered the remainder of the royal military defeated.[34] By the settlement referred to as the Mise of Lewes, Edward and his cousin Henry of Almain got up as hostages to Montfort.[35]

There are three sections. In the left, a groups of knights in armour are holding a naked body, seemingly attacking it with their swords. In the middle, a naked body lies with severed arms, legs and head nest to a uniform, arms and another prone body. The right section seemingly depicts a pile of dead bodies in armour.

Edward remained in captivity till March, and even after his launch he was saved below strict surveillance.[36] Then, on 28 May, he managed to flee his custodians and joined up with Gilbert de Clare, seventh Earl of Gloucester, who had just lately defected to the King’s aspect.[37]

Montfort’s help was now dwindling, and Edward retook Worcester and Gloucester with comparatively little effort.[38] Meanwhile, Montfort had made an alliance with Llywelyn and began transferring east to hitch forces together with his son Simon. Edward managed to make a shock assault at Kenilworth Castle, the place the youthful Montfort was quartered, earlier than transferring on to chop off the earl of Leicester.[39] The two forces then met on the second nice encounter of the Barons’ War, the Battle of Evesham, on 4 August 1265. Montfort stood little probability in opposition to the superior royal forces, and after his defeat he was killed and mutilated on the sector.[40]

Through such episodes because the deception of Derby at Gloucester, Edward acquired a popularity as untrustworthy. During the summer time marketing campaign, although, he started to study from his errors, and acted in a manner that gained the respect and admiration of his contemporaries.[41] The warfare didn’t finish with Montfort’s demise, and Edward participated within the continued campaigning. At Christmas, he got here to phrases with Simon the Younger and his associates on the Isle of Axholme in Lincolnshire, and in March he led a profitable assault on the Cinque Ports.[42] A contingent of rebels held out within the nearly impregnable Kenilworth Castle and didn’t give up till the drafting of the conciliatory Dictum of Kenilworth.[43][d] In April it appeared as if Gloucester would take up the reason for the reform motion, and civil warfare would resume, however after a renegotiation of the phrases of the Dictum of Kenilworth, the events got here to an settlement.[44][e] Edward, nevertheless, was little concerned within the settlement negotiations following the wars; at this level his most important focus was on planning his forthcoming campaign.[45]

Crusade and accession[edit]

Troop movements by the Franks, Mamluks and Mongols between Egypt, Cyprus and the Levant in 1271, as described in the corresponding article.

Operations in the course of the Crusade of Edward I

Edward took the crusader’s cross in an elaborate ceremony on 24 June 1268, together with his brother Edmund Crouchback and cousin Henry of Almain. Among others who dedicated themselves to the Ninth Crusade have been Edward’s former adversaries – just like the Earl of Gloucester, although de Clare didn’t finally take part.[46] With the nation pacified, the best obstacle to the challenge was offering adequate funds.[47] King Louis IX of France, who was the chief of the campaign, offered a loan of about £17,500.[48] This, nevertheless, was not sufficient; the remainder needed to be raised via a tax on the laity, which had not been levied since 1237.[48] In May 1270, Parliament granted a tax of a twentieth,[f] in change for which the King agreed to reconfirm Magna Carta, and to impose restrictions on Jewish cash lending.[49] On 20 August Edward sailed from Dover for France.[50] Historians haven’t decided the dimensions of the power with any certainty, however Edward most likely introduced with him round 225 knights and altogether fewer than 1000 males.[47]

Originally, the Crusaders supposed to alleviate the beleaguered Christian stronghold of Acre, however King Louis had been diverted to Tunis. Louis and his brother Charles of Anjou, the king of Sicily, determined to assault the emirate to ascertain a stronghold in North Africa.[51] The plans failed when the French forces have been struck by an epidemic which, on 25 August, took the lifetime of Louis himself.[g] By the time Edward arrived at Tunis, Charles had already signed a treaty with the emir, and there was little else to do however return to Sicily. The campaign was postponed till the next spring, however a devastating storm off the coast of Sicily dissuaded Charles and Louis’s successor Philip III from any additional campaigning.[53] Edward determined to proceed alone, and on 9 May 1271 he lastly landed at Acre.[54]

The assassination try in opposition to Edward I in June 1272

By then, the scenario within the Holy Land was a precarious one. Jerusalem had fallen in 1244, and Acre was now the centre of the Christian state.[55] The Muslim states have been on the offensive below the Mamluk management of Baibars, and have been now threatening Acre itself. Though Edward’s males have been an necessary addition to the garrison, they stood little probability in opposition to Baibars’ superior forces, and an preliminary raid at close by St Georges-de-Lebeyne in June was largely futile.[56] An embassy to the Ilkhan Abaqa[57] (1234–1282) of the Mongols helped result in an assault on Aleppo within the north, which helped to distract Baibars’ forces.[58] In November, Edward led a raid on Qaqun, which may have served as a bridgehead to Jerusalem, however each the Mongol invasion and the assault on Qaqun failed. Things now appeared more and more determined, and in May 1272 Hugh III of Cyprus, who was the nominal king of Jerusalem, signed a ten-year truce with Baibars.[59] Edward was initially defiant, however an assassination try by a Syrian Nizari (Assassin) supposedly despatched by Baibars in June 1272 pressured him to desert any additional campaigning. Although he managed to kill the murderer, he was struck within the arm by a dagger feared to be poisoned, and have become severely weakened over the next months.[60][h][62]

It was not till 24 September 1272 that Edward left Acre. Arriving in Sicily, he was met with the information that his father had died on 16 November 1272.[63] Edward was deeply saddened by this information, however slightly than hurrying house directly, he made a leisurely journey northwards. This was due partly to his still-poor well being, but additionally to a scarcity of urgency.[64] The political scenario in England was steady after the mid-century upheavals, and Edward was proclaimed king after his father’s demise, slightly than at his personal coronation, as had till then been customary.[65][i] In Edward’s absence, the nation was ruled by a royal council, led by Robert Burnell.[66] The new king launched into an overland journey via Italy and France, the place amongst different issues he visited Pope Gregory X. Only on 2 August 1274 did he return to England, and he was topped on 19 August.[67]

Early reign, 1274–1296[edit]

Welsh wars[edit]

Conquest[edit]

Wales after the Treaty of Montgomery of 1267

  Gwynedd, Llywelyn ap Gruffudd’s principality

  Territories conquered by Llywelyn

  Territories of Llywelyn’s vassals

  Lordships of the Marcher barons

  Lordships of the King of England

Llywelyn ap Gruffudd loved an advantageous scenario within the aftermath of the Barons’ War. Through the 1267 Treaty of Montgomery, he formally obtained land he had conquered within the Four Cantrefs of Perfeddwlad and was recognised in his title of Prince of Wales.[68][69] Armed conflicts however continued, specifically with sure dissatisfied Marcher Lords, reminiscent of Gilbert de Clare, Earl of Gloucester, Roger Mortimer and Humphrey de Bohun, third Earl of Hereford.[70] Problems have been exacerbated when Llywelyn’s youthful brother Dafydd and Gruffydd ap Gwenwynwyn of Powys, after failing in an assassination try in opposition to Llywelyn, defected to the English in 1274.[71] Citing ongoing hostilities and Edward’s harbouring of his enemies, Llywelyn refused to do homage to the King.[72] For Edward, an additional provocation got here from Llywelyn’s deliberate marriage to Eleanor, daughter of Simon de Montfort.[73]

In November 1276, warfare was declared.[74] Initial operations have been launched below the captaincy of Mortimer, Edward’s brother Edmund, Earl of Lancaster, and William de Beauchamp, ninth Earl of Warwick.[74][j] Support for Llywelyn was weak amongst his personal countrymen.[75] In July 1277 Edward invaded with a power of 15,500, of whom 9,000 have been Welshmen.[76] The marketing campaign by no means got here to a serious battle, and Llywelyn quickly realised he had no alternative however to give up.[76] By the Treaty of Aberconwy in November 1277, he was left solely with the land of Gwynedd, although he was allowed to retain the title of Prince of Wales.[77]

When warfare broke out once more in 1282, it was a wholly totally different enterprise. For the Welsh, this warfare was over nationwide id, having fun with broad help, provoked significantly by makes an attempt to impose English legislation on Welsh topics.[78] For Edward, it grew to become a warfare of conquest slightly than merely a punitive expedition, like the previous marketing campaign.[79] The warfare began with a insurrection by Dafydd, who was discontented with the reward he had obtained from Edward in 1277.[80] Llywelyn and different Welsh chieftains quickly joined in, and initially the Welsh skilled army success. In June, Gloucester was defeated on the Battle of Llandeilo Fawr.[81] On 6 November, whereas John Peckham, Archbishop of Canterbury, was conducting peace negotiations, Edward’s commander of Anglesey, Luke de Tany, determined to hold out a shock assault. A pontoon bridge had been constructed to the mainland, however shortly after Tany and his males crossed over, they have been ambushed by the Welsh and suffered heavy losses on the Battle of Moel-y-don.[82] The Welsh advances ended on 11 December, nevertheless, when Llywelyn was lured right into a entice and killed on the Battle of Orewin Bridge.[83] The conquest of Gwynedd was full with the seize in June 1283 of Dafydd, who was taken to Shrewsbury and executed as a traitor the next autumn.[84]

Further rebellions occurred in 1287–88 and, extra critically, in 1294, below the management of Madog ap Llywelyn, a distant relative of Llywelyn ap Gruffudd.[85] This final battle demanded the King’s personal consideration, however in each instances the rebellions have been put down.

Colonisation[edit]

By the 1284 Statute of Rhuddlan, the Principality of Wales was included into England and was given an administrative system just like the English, with counties policed by sheriffs.[86] English legislation was launched in felony instances, although the Welsh have been allowed to take care of their very own customary legal guidelines in some instances of property disputes.[87] After 1277, and more and more after 1283, Edward launched into a full-scale challenge of English settlement of Wales, creating new cities like Flint, Aberystwyth and Rhuddlan.[88] Their new residents have been English migrants, with the native Welsh banned from residing inside them, and lots of have been protected by in depth partitions.[89]

An in depth challenge of castle-building was additionally initiated, below the path of Master James of Saint George, a prestigious architect whom Edward had met in Savoy on his return from the campaign.[90] These included the Beaumaris, Caernarfon, Conwy and Harlech castles, supposed to behave each as fortresses and royal palaces for the King.[91] His programme of chateau constructing in Wales heralded the introduction of the widespread use of arrowslits in fort partitions throughout Europe, drawing on Eastern influences.[92] Also a product of the Crusades was the introduction of the concentric fort, and 4 of the eight castles Edward based in Wales adopted this design.[93] The castles made a transparent, imperial assertion about Edward’s intentions to rule North Wales completely, and drew on imagery related to the Byzantine Roman Empire and King Arthur in an try to construct legitimacy for his new regime.[94]

In 1284, King Edward had his son Edward (later Edward II) born at Caernarfon Castle, most likely to make a deliberate assertion in regards to the new political order in Wales.[95]David Powel, a Sixteenth-century clergyman, steered that the child was supplied to the Welsh as a prince “that was borne in Wales and could speake never a word of English”, however there isn’t any proof to help this account.[96] In 1301 at Lincoln, the younger Edward grew to become the primary English prince to be invested with the title of Prince of Wales, when the King granted him the Earldom of Chester and lands throughout North Wales.[97] The King appears to have hoped that this is able to assist in the pacification of the area, and that it will give his son extra monetary independence.[97][k]

Diplomacy and warfare on the continent[edit]

A miniature of Edward giving homage to Philip IV

Edward by no means once more went on campaign after his return to England in 1274, however he maintained an intention to take action, and took the cross once more in 1287.[99] This intention guided a lot of his international coverage, till not less than 1291. To stage a European-wide campaign, it was important to stop battle between the higher princes on the continent. A serious impediment to this was represented by the battle between the French Capetian House of Anjou ruling southern Italy and the Kingdom of Aragon in Spain. In 1282, the residents of Palermo rose up in opposition to Charles of Anjou and turned for assist to Peter III of Aragon, in what has turn into referred to as the Sicilian Vespers. In the warfare that adopted, Charles of Anjou’s son, Charles of Salerno, was taken prisoner by the Aragonese.[100] The French started planning an assault on Aragon, elevating the prospect of a large-scale European warfare. To Edward, it was crucial that such a warfare be prevented, and in Paris in 1286 he brokered a truce between France and Aragon that helped safe Charles’ launch.[101] As far because the crusades have been involved, nevertheless, Edward’s efforts proved ineffective. A devastating blow to his plans got here in 1291, when the Mamluks captured Acre, the final Christian stronghold within the Holy Land.[102]

After the autumn of Acre, Edward’s worldwide function modified from that of a diplomat to an antagonist. He had lengthy been deeply concerned within the affairs of his personal Duchy of Gascony. In 1278 he assigned an investigating fee to his trusted associates Otto de Grandson and the chancellor Robert Burnell, which prompted the alternative of the seneschal Luke de Tany.[103] In 1286, Edward visited the area himself and stayed for nearly three years.[104] The perennial drawback, nevertheless, was the standing of Gascony inside the kingdom of France, and Edward’s function because the French king’s vassal. On his diplomatic mission in 1286, Edward had paid homage to the brand new king, Philip IV, however in 1294 Philip declared Gascony forfeit when Edward refused to seem earlier than him in Paris to debate the current battle between English, Gascon, and French sailors that had resulted in a number of French ships being captured, together with the sacking of the French port of La Rochelle.[105]

Eleanor of Castile had died on 28 November 1290. The couple cherished one another and like his father, Edward was very dedicated to his spouse and was devoted to her all through their married lives. He was deeply affected by her demise. He displayed his grief by erecting twelve so-called Eleanor crosses, one at every place the place her funeral cortège stopped for the evening.[106] As a part of the peace accord between England and France in 1294, it was agreed that Edward ought to marry Philip IV’s half-sister Margaret, however the marriage was delayed by the outbreak of warfare.[107]

Edward made alliances with the German king, the counts of Flanders and Guelders, and the Burgundians, who would assault France from the north.[108] However, the alliances proved risky and Edward was dealing with hassle at house on the time, each in Wales and Scotland. It was not till August 1297 that he was lastly capable of sail for Flanders, at which era his allies there had already suffered defeat.[109] The help from Germany by no means materialised, and Edward was pressured to hunt peace. His marriage to Margaret in 1299 ended the warfare, however the entire affair had confirmed each expensive and fruitless for the English.[110][l]

Great Cause[edit]

The relationship between England and Scotland by the 1280s was one in all comparatively harmonious coexistence.[111] The difficulty of homage didn’t attain the identical stage of controversy because it did in Wales; in 1278 King Alexander III of Scotland paid homage to Edward I, who was his brother-in-law, however apparently just for the lands he held of Edward in England.[112] Problems arose solely with the Scottish succession disaster of the early 1290s. When Alexander died in 1286, he left as inheritor to the Scottish throne Margaret, his three-year-old granddaughter and sole surviving descendant.[113] By the Treaty of Birgham, it was agreed that Margaret ought to marry King Edward’s six-year-old son Edward of Carnarvon, although Scotland would stay freed from English overlordship.[114][115]

Margaret, by now seven years of age, sailed from Norway for Scotland within the autumn of 1290, however fell unwell on the way in which and died in Orkney.[116][117] This left the nation with out an apparent inheritor, and led to the succession dispute identified to historical past because the Great Cause.[118][m]

Even although as many as fourteen claimants put ahead their claims to the title, the actual contest was between John Balliol and Robert de Brus, fifth Lord of Annandale.[119] The Scottish magnates made a request to Edward to conduct the proceedings and administer the result, however to not arbitrate within the dispute. The precise determination could be made by 104 auditors – 40 appointed by Balliol, 40 by Brus and the remaining 24 chosen by Edward I from senior members of the Scottish political neighborhood.[120] At Birgham, with the prospect of a private union between the 2 realms, the query of suzerainty had not been of nice significance to Edward. Now he insisted that, if he have been to settle the competition, he needed to be totally recognised as Scotland’s feudal overlord.[121] The Scots have been reluctant to make such a concession, and replied that because the nation had no king, nobody had the authority to make this determination.[122] This drawback was circumvented when the opponents agreed that the realm could be handed over to Edward till a rightful inheritor had been discovered.[123] After a prolonged listening to, a choice was made in favour of John Balliol on 17 November 1292.[124][n]

Even after Balliol’s accession, Edward nonetheless continued to say his authority over Scotland. Against the objections of the Scots, he agreed to listen to appeals on instances dominated on by the court docket of guardians that had ruled Scotland in the course of the interregnum.[125] An additional provocation got here in a case introduced by Macduff, son of Malcolm II, Earl of Fife, by which Edward demanded that Balliol seem in individual earlier than the English Parliament to reply the fees.[126] This the Scottish King did, however the closing straw was Edward’s demand that the Scottish magnates present army service within the warfare in opposition to France.[127] This was unacceptable; the Scots as an alternative shaped an alliance with France and launched an unsuccessful assault on Carlisle.[128] Edward responded by invading Scotland in 1296 and taking the city of Berwick-upon-Tweed in a very bloody assault.[129] At the Battle of Dunbar, Scottish resistance was successfully crushed.[130] Edward confiscated the Stone of Destiny – the Scottish coronation stone – and introduced it to Westminster inserting it in what grew to become referred to as King Edward’s Chair; he deposed Balliol and positioned him within the Tower of London, and put in Englishmen to control the nation.[131] The marketing campaign had been very profitable, however the English triumph would solely be short-term.[132]

Government and legislation[edit]

Character as king[edit]

Round desk, made by Edward, now hung in Winchester Castle. It bears the names of assorted knights of King Arthur’s court docket.

Edward had a popularity for a fierce mood, and he may very well be intimidating; one story tells of how the Dean of St Paul’s, wishing to confront Edward over the excessive stage of taxation in 1295, fell down and died as soon as he was within the King’s presence.[9] When Edward of Caernarfon demanded an earldom for his favorite Gaveston, the King erupted in anger and supposedly tore out handfuls of his son’s hair.[133] Some of his contemporaries thought of Edward scary, significantly in his early days. The Song of Lewes in 1264 described him as a leopard, an animal thought to be significantly highly effective and unpredictable.[134]

Despite these scary character traits, nevertheless, Edward’s contemporaries thought of him an in a position, even a perfect, king.[135] Though not cherished by his topics, he was feared and revered.[136] He met up to date expectations of kingship in his function as an in a position, decided soldier and in his embodiment of shared chivalric beliefs.[137] In spiritual observance he additionally fulfilled the expectations of his age: he attended chapel often and gave alms generously.[138]

Edward took a eager curiosity within the tales of King Arthur, which have been extremely standard in Europe throughout his reign.[139] In 1278 he visited Glastonbury Abbey to open what was then believed to be the tomb of Arthur and Guinevere, recovering “Arthur’s crown” from Llywelyn after the conquest of North Wales, whereas, as famous above, his new castles drew upon the Arthurian myths of their design and placement.[140] He held “Round Table” occasions in 1284 and 1302, involving tournaments and feasting, and chroniclers in contrast him and the occasions at his court docket to Arthur.[141] In some instances Edward seems to have used his curiosity within the Arthurian myths to serve his personal political pursuits, together with legitimising his rule in Wales and discrediting the Welsh perception that Arthur may return as their political savior.[142]

Administration and the legislation[edit]

Groat of Edward I (4 pence). Two cash exhibiting obverse and reverse of similar denomination. On left is the obverse, exhibiting a head with a coronet. Surrounding textual content says, in abbreviated Latin, “Edward, by the grace of God King of England”. The reverse exhibits a cross and the textual content “Duke of Aquitaine and Lord of Ireland”, and “Made in London”.

Soon after assuming the throne, Edward set about restoring order and re-establishing royal authority after the disastrous reign of his father.[143] To accomplish this, he instantly ordered an intensive change of administrative personnel. The most necessary of those was the appointment of Robert Burnell as chancellor, a person who would stay within the submit till 1292 as one of many King’s closest associates.[144] Edward then changed most native officers, such because the escheators and sheriffs.[145] This final measure was accomplished in preparation for an intensive inquest overlaying all of England, that will hear complaints about abuse of energy by royal officers. The inquest produced the set of so-called Hundred Rolls, from the executive subdivision of the hundred.[o] The second goal of the inquest was to ascertain what land and rights the crown had misplaced in the course of the reign of Henry III.[146]

The Hundred Rolls shaped the idea for the later authorized inquiries referred to as the Quo warranto proceedings. The goal of those inquiries was to ascertain by what warrant (Latin: Quo warranto) varied liberties have been held.[147][p] If the defendant couldn’t produce a royal licence to show the grant of the freedom, then it was the Crown’s opinion – based mostly on the writings of the influential thirteenth-century authorized scholar Henry de Bracton – that the freedom ought to revert to the king.

Both the Statute of Westminster 1275 and Statute of Westminster 1285 codified the present legislation in England. By enacting the Statute of Gloucester in 1278 the King challenged baronial rights via a revival of the system of normal eyres (royal justices to go on tour all through the land) and thru a big enhance within the variety of pleas of quo warranto to be heard by such eyres.

This prompted nice consternation among the many aristocracy, who insisted that lengthy use in itself constituted licence.[148] A compromise was finally reached in 1290, whereby a liberty was thought of professional so long as it may very well be proven to have been exercised because the coronation of Richard the Lionheart in 1189.[149] Royal positive factors from the Quo warranto proceedings have been insignificant; few liberties have been returned to the King.[150] Edward had however received a big victory, in clearly establishing the precept that each one liberties primarily emanated from the Crown.[151]

The 1290 statute of Quo warranto was just one a part of a wider legislative effort, which was some of the necessary contributions of Edward’s reign.[152] This period of legislative motion had began already on the time of the baronial reform motion; the Statute of Marlborough (1267) contained components each of the Provisions of Oxford and the Dictum of Kenilworth.[153] The compilation of the Hundred Rolls was adopted shortly after by the difficulty of Westminster I (1275), which asserted the royal prerogative and outlined restrictions on liberties.[154] In the Mortmain (1279), the difficulty was grants of land to the church.[155] The first clause of Westminster II (1285), referred to as De donis conditionalibus, handled household settlement of land, and entails.[156]Merchants (1285) established agency guidelines for the restoration of money owed,[157] whereas Winchester (1285) handled peacekeeping on an area stage.[158]Quia emptores (1290) – issued together with Quo warranto – got down to treatment land possession disputes ensuing from alienation of land by subinfeudation.[159] The age of the nice statutes largely ended with the demise of Robert Burnell in 1292.[160]

Finances, parliament and the expulsion of Jews[edit]

Below a piece of text is seen a king on a throne on a podium. On either side is seen a king and a bishop in front of the podium and clerks behind it. In front of this sit a number of lay and ecclesiastical lords, and more clerks, in a square on a chequered floor.

Sixteenth-century illustration of Edward I presiding over Parliament. The scene exhibits Alexander III of Scotland and Llywelyn ap Gruffudd of Wales on both aspect of Edward; an episode that by no means really occurred.[161]

Edward I’s frequent army campaigns put an awesome monetary pressure on the nation.[162] There have been a number of methods via which the King may increase cash for warfare, together with customs duties, cash lending and lay subsidies. In 1275, Edward I negotiated an settlement with the home service provider neighborhood that secured a everlasting obligation on wool. In 1303, an analogous settlement was reached with international retailers, in return for sure rights and privileges.[163] The revenues from the customs obligation have been dealt with by the Riccardi, a gaggle of bankers from Lucca in Italy.[164] This was in return for his or her service as cash lenders to the crown, which helped finance the Welsh Wars. When the warfare with France broke out, the French king confiscated the Riccardi’s belongings, and the bank went bankrupt.[165] After this, the Frescobaldi of Florence took over the function as cash lenders to the English crown.[166]

Another supply of crown earnings was represented by the English Jews. The Jews have been the King’s private property, and he was free to tax them at will.[167] By 1280, the Jews had been exploited to a stage at which they have been not of a lot monetary use to the crown, however they might nonetheless be utilized in political bargaining.[168] Their loan with curiosity enterprise – a apply forbidden to Christians – had made many individuals indebted to them and prompted normal standard resentment.[169] In 1275, Edward had issued the Statute of the Jewry, which outlawed loan with curiosity and inspired the Jews to take up different professions;[170] in 1279, within the context of a crack-down on coin-clippers, he arrested all of the heads of Jewish households in England and had round 300 of them executed.[171] In 1280, he ordered all Jews to attend particular sermons, preached by Dominican friars, with the hope of persuading them to transform, however these exhortations weren’t adopted.[172] The closing assault on the Jews in England got here within the Edict of Expulsion in 1290, whereby Edward formally expelled all Jews from England.[173] This not solely generated revenues via royal appropriation of Jewish loans and property, nevertheless it additionally gave Edward the political capital to barter a considerable lay subsidy within the 1290 Parliament.[174] The expulsion, which was reversed within the 1650s,[175] adopted a precedent set by different European rulers: Philip II of France had expelled all Jews from his personal lands in 1182; John I, Duke of Brittany, drove them out of his duchy in 1239; and within the late 1240s Louis IX of France had expelled the Jews from the royal demesne earlier than his first passage to the East.[172]

Edward held Parliament on a fairly common foundation all through his reign.[176] In 1295, nevertheless, a big change occurred. For this Parliament, along with the secular and ecclesiastical lords, two knights from every county and two representatives from every borough have been summoned.[177] The illustration of commons in Parliament was nothing new; what was new was the authority below which these representatives have been summoned. Whereas beforehand the commons had been anticipated merely to assent to selections already made by the magnates, it was now proclaimed that they need to meet with the total authority (plena potestas) of their communities, to offer assent to selections made in Parliament.[178] The King now had full backing for gathering lay subsidies from your complete inhabitants. Lay subsidies have been taxes collected at a sure fraction of the moveable property of all laymen.[179] Whereas Henry III had solely collected 4 of those in his reign, Edward I collected 9.[180] This format finally grew to become the usual for later Parliaments, and historians have named the meeting the “Model Parliament”.[181][q]

Later reign, 1297–1307[edit]

Constitutional disaster[edit]

The incessant warfare of the 1290s put an awesome monetary demand on Edward’s topics. Whereas the King had solely levied three lay subsidies till 1294, 4 such taxes have been granted within the years 1294–97, elevating over £200,000.[182] Along with this got here the burden of prises, seizure of wool and hides, and the unpopular extra obligation on wool, dubbed the maltolt.[183] The fiscal calls for on the King’s topics prompted resentment, and this resentment finally led to severe political opposition. The preliminary resistance was not attributable to the lay taxes, nevertheless, however by clerical subsidies. In 1294, Edward made a requirement of a grant of 1 half of all clerical revenues. There was some resistance, however the King responded by threatening with outlawry, and the grant was finally made.[184] At the time, the archbishopric of Canterbury was vacant, since Robert Winchelsey was in Italy to obtain consecration.[185][r] Winchelsey returned in January 1295 and needed to consent to a different grant in November of that yr. In 1296, nevertheless, his place modified when he obtained the papal bull Clericis laicos. This bull prohibited the clergy from paying taxes to put authorities with out specific consent from the Pope.[186] When the clergy, on the subject of the bull, refused to pay, Edward responded with outlawry.[187] Winchelsey was offered with a dilemma between loyalty to the King and upholding the papal bull, and he responded by leaving it to each particular person clergyman to pay as he noticed match.[188] By the tip of the yr, an answer was supplied by the brand new papal bull Etsi de statu, which allowed clerical taxation in instances of urgent urgency.[189]

Edward
By God, Sir Earl, both go or cling
Roger Bigod
By that very same oath, O king, I shall neither go nor cling

Chronicle of Walter of Guisborough[190]

Opposition from the laity took longer to floor. This resistance targeted on two issues: the King’s proper to demand army service, and his proper to levy taxes. At the Salisbury parliament of February 1297, Earl Marshal Roger Bigod, fifth Earl of Norfolk, objected to a royal summons of army service. Bigod argued that the army obligation solely prolonged to service alongside the King; if the King supposed to sail to Flanders, he couldn’t ship his topics to Gascony.[191] In July, Bigod and Humphrey de Bohun, third Earl of Hereford and Constable of England, drew up a collection of complaints referred to as the Remonstrances, by which objections to the extortionate stage of taxation have been voiced.[192] Undeterred, Edward requested one other lay subsidy. This one was significantly provocative, as a result of the King had sought consent solely from a small group of magnates, slightly than from representatives from the communities in parliament.[193] While Edward was in Winchelsea, getting ready for the marketing campaign in Flanders, Bigod and Bohun turned up on the Exchequer to stop the gathering of the tax.[194] As the King left the nation with a vastly diminished power, the dominion appeared to be on the verge of civil warfare.[195][196] What resolved the scenario was the English defeat by the Scots on the Battle of Stirling Bridge. The renewed risk to the homeland gave king and magnates frequent trigger.[197] Edward signed the Confirmatio cartarum – a affirmation of Magna Carta and its accompanying Charter of the Forest – and the the Aristocracy agreed to serve with the King on a marketing campaign in Scotland.[198]

Edward’s issues with the opposition didn’t finish with the Falkirk marketing campaign. Over the next years he could be held as much as the guarantees he had made, specifically that of upholding the Charter of the Forest.[s] In the parliament of 1301, the King was pressured to order an evaluation of the royal forests, however in 1305 he obtained a papal bull that freed him from this concession.[199] Ultimately, it was a failure in personnel that spelt the tip of the opposition in opposition to Edward. Bohun died late in 1298, after coming back from the Falkirk marketing campaign.[200] In 1302 Bigod arrived at an settlement with the King that was helpful for each: Bigod, who had no kids, made Edward his inheritor, in return for a beneficiant annual grant.[201] Edward lastly obtained his revenge on Winchelsey in 1305, when Clement V was elected pope. Clement was a Gascon sympathetic to the King, and on Edward’s instigation had Winchelsey suspended from workplace.[202]

Return to Scotland[edit]

Edward had motive to imagine that he had accomplished the conquest of Scotland when he left the nation in 1296, however resistance quickly emerged below the management of Andrew de Moray within the north and William Wallace within the south. On 11 September 1297, a big English power below the management of John de Warenne, sixth Earl of Surrey, and Hugh de Cressingham was routed by a a lot smaller Scottish military led by Wallace and Moray at Stirling Bridge.[203] The defeat despatched shockwaves into England, and preparations for a retaliatory marketing campaign began instantly. Soon after Edward returned from Flanders, he headed north.[204] On 22 July 1298, in the one main battle he had fought since Evesham in 1265, Edward defeated Wallace’s forces on the Battle of Falkirk.[205] Edward, nevertheless, was not capable of benefit from the momentum, and the subsequent yr the Scots managed to recapture Stirling Castle.[206] Even although Edward campaigned in Scotland each in 1300, when he efficiently besieged Caerlaverock Castle and in 1301, the Scots refused to have interaction in open battle once more, preferring as an alternative to raid the English countryside in smaller teams.[207]

The defeated Scots appealed to Pope Boniface VIII to say a declare of overlordship to Scotland rather than the English. His papal bull addressed to King Edward in these phrases was firmly rejected on Edward’s behalf by the Barons’ Letter of 1301. The English managed to subdue the nation by different means, nevertheless. In 1303, a peace settlement was reached between England and France, successfully breaking apart the Franco-Scottish alliance.[208]Robert the Bruce, the grandson of the claimant to the crown in 1291, had sided with the English within the winter of 1301–02.[209] By 1304, many of the different nobles of the nation had additionally pledged their allegiance to Edward, and this yr the English additionally managed to re-take Stirling Castle.[210] An ideal propaganda victory was achieved in 1305 when Wallace was betrayed by Sir John de Menteith and turned over to the English, who had him taken to London the place he was publicly executed.[211] With Scotland largely below English management, Edward put in Englishmen and collaborating Scots to control the nation.[212]

The scenario modified once more on 10 February 1306, when Robert the Bruce murdered his rival John Comyn, and some weeks later, on 25 March, was topped King of Scotland by Isobel, sister of the Earl of Buchan.[213] Bruce now launched into a marketing campaign to revive Scottish independence, and this marketing campaign took the English unexpectedly.[214] Edward was struggling unwell well being by this time, and as an alternative of main an expedition himself, he gave totally different army instructions to Aymer de Valence, 2nd Earl of Pembroke, and Henry Percy, 1st Baron Percy, whereas the primary royal military was led by the Prince of Wales.[215] The English initially met with success; on 19 June, Aymer de Valence routed Bruce on the Battle of Methven.[216] Bruce was pressured into hiding, whereas the English forces recaptured their misplaced territory and castles.[217]

Edward acted with uncommon brutality in opposition to Bruce’s household, allies, and supporters. His sister, Mary, was imprisoned in a cage at Roxburgh Castle for 4 years. Isabella MacDuff, Countess of Buchan, who had topped Bruce, was held in a cage at Berwick Castle. His youthful brother Neil was executed by being hanged, drawn, and quartered; he had been captured after he and his garrison held off Edward’s forces who had been searching for his spouse Elizabeth, daughter Marjorie, sisters Mary and Christina, and Isabella.[218][219]

It was clear that Edward now regarded the wrestle not as a warfare between two nations, however because the suppression of a insurrection of disloyal topics.[220] This brutality, although, slightly than serving to to subdue the Scots, had the other impact, and rallied rising help for Bruce.[221]

Death[edit]

An open tomb seen from the side in a 45-degree angle from the ground. The corpse, with his head to the left, is dressed in fine funeral attire, wears a coronet and holds a sceptre in each hand.

Remains of Edward I, from an illustration made when his tomb was opened in 1774

In February 1307, Bruce resumed his efforts and began gathering males, and in May he defeated Valence on the Battle of Loudoun Hill.[222] Edward, who had rallied considerably, now moved north himself. On the way in which, nevertheless, he developed dysentery, and his situation deteriorated. On 6 July he encamped at Burgh by Sands, simply south of the Scottish border. When his servants got here the subsequent morning to carry him up in order that he may eat, he died of their arms.[223]

Various tales emerged about Edward’s deathbed needs; in accordance with one custom, he requested that his coronary heart be carried to the Holy Land, together with a military to battle the infidels. A extra doubtful story tells of how he wished for his bones to be carried alongside on future expeditions in opposition to the Scots. Another account of his deathbed scene is extra credible; in accordance with one chronicle, Edward gathered round him Henry de Lacy, third Earl of Lincoln; Guy de Beauchamp, tenth Earl of Warwick; Aymer de Valence; and Robert de Clifford, 1st Baron de Clifford, and charged them with taking care of his son Edward. In specific they need to guarantee that Piers Gaveston was not allowed to return to the nation.[224] This want, nevertheless, the son ignored, and had his favorite recalled from exile nearly instantly.[225] The new king, Edward II, remained within the north till August, however then deserted the marketing campaign and headed south.[226] He was topped king on 25 February 1308.[227]

The nineteenth century memorial to Edward I at Burgh Marsh. This construction changed an earlier one and is claimed to mark the precise spot the place he died.

Edward I’s physique was introduced south, mendacity in state at Waltham Abbey, earlier than being buried in Westminster Abbey on 27 October.[228] There are few data of the funeral, which value £473.[228] Edward’s tomb was an unusually plain sarcophagus of Purbeck marble, with out the customary royal effigy, presumably the results of the scarcity of royal funds after the King’s demise.[229] The sarcophagus could usually have been coated over with wealthy material, and initially may need been surrounded by carved busts and a devotional spiritual picture, all since misplaced.[230] The Society of Antiquaries of London opened the tomb in 1774, discovering that the physique had been effectively preserved over the previous 467 years, and took the chance to find out the King’s authentic top.[231][t] Traces of the Latin inscription Edwardus Primus Scottorum Malleus hic est, 1308. Pactum Serva (“Here is Edward I, Hammer of the Scots, 1308. Keep the Vow”) can nonetheless be seen painted on the aspect of the tomb, referring to his vow to avenge the insurrection of Robert Bruce.[232] This resulted in Edward being given the epithet the “Hammer of the Scots” by historians, however shouldn’t be up to date in origin, having been added by the Abbot John Feckenham within the Sixteenth century.[233]

Historiography[edit]

An old man in half-figure on a chair, with his right arm over the back, facing the viewer. His hair and large muttonchops are white, his attire is black and simple.

Bishop William Stubbs, in his Constitutional History (1873–78), emphasised Edward I’s contribution to the English structure.

The first histories of Edward within the Sixteenth and seventeenth centuries drew totally on the works of the chroniclers, and made little use of the official data of the interval.[234] They restricted themselves to normal feedback on Edward’s significance as a monarch, and echoed the chroniclers’ reward for his accomplishments.[235] During the seventeenth century, the lawyer Edward Coke wrote extensively about Edward’s laws, terming the King the “English Justinian”, after the famend Byzantine lawmaker, Justinian I.[236] Later within the century, historians used the obtainable document proof to handle the function of parliament and kingship below Edward, drawing comparisons between his reign and the political strife of their very own century.[237] 18th-century historians established an image of Edward as an in a position, if ruthless, monarch, conditioned by the circumstances of his personal time.[238]

The influential Victorian historian William Stubbs as an alternative steered that Edward had actively formed nationwide historical past, forming English legal guidelines and establishments, and serving to England to develop a parliamentary and constitutional monarchy.[239] His strengths and weaknesses as a ruler have been thought of to be emblematic of the English folks as a complete.[240] Stubbs’ student, Thomas Tout, initially adopted the identical perspective, however after in depth analysis into Edward’s royal family, and backed by the analysis of his contemporaries into the early parliaments of the interval, he modified his thoughts.[241] Tout got here to view Edward as a self-interested, conservative chief, utilizing the parliamentary system as “the shrewd device of an autocrat, anxious to use the mass of the people as a check upon his hereditary foes among the greater baronage.”[242]

Historians within the twentieth and twenty first century have performed in depth analysis on Edward and his reign.[243] Most have concluded this was a extremely vital interval in English medieval historical past, some going additional and describing Edward as one of many nice medieval kings, though most additionally agree that his closing years have been much less profitable than his early many years in energy.[244][u] Three main tutorial narratives of Edward have been produced throughout this era.[249]F. M. Powicke’s volumes, revealed in 1947 and 1953, forming the usual works on Edward for a number of many years, have been largely constructive in praising the achievements of his reign, and specifically his deal with justice and the legislation.[250] In 1988, Michael Prestwich produced an authoritative biography of the King, specializing in his political profession, nonetheless portraying him in sympathetic phrases, however highlighting a number of the penalties of his failed insurance policies.[251]Marc Morris’s biography adopted in 2008, drawing out extra of the element of Edward’s character, and customarily taking a harsher view of his weaknesses and fewer nice traits.[252] Considerable tutorial debate has taken place across the character of Edward’s kingship, his political expertise, and specifically his administration of his earls, and the diploma to which this was collaborative or repressive in nature.[253]

There can be an awesome distinction between English and Scottish historiography on King Edward. G. W. S. Barrow, in his biography on Robert the Bruce, accused Edward of ruthlessly exploiting the leaderless state of Scotland to acquire a feudal superiority over the dominion adopted by his willpower to cut back it to nothing greater than an English possession.[254] The similar view of Edward as a conquering tyrant is offered in Evan Macleod Barron’s large overview of the Scottish War of Independence.[255]

First marriage[edit]

Carving of Edward

King Edward

Carving of Eleanor

Queen Eleanor

By his first spouse Eleanor of Castile, Edward had not less than fourteen kids, maybe as many as sixteen. Of these, 5 daughters survived into maturity, however just one son outlived his father, turning into King Edward II (1307–1327). He was reportedly involved together with his son’s failure to dwell as much as the expectations of an inheritor to the crown, and at one level determined to exile the prince’s favorite Piers Gaveston.[256] Edward’s kids with Eleanor have been:[257]

  • Katherine (earlier than 17 June 1264 – 5 September 1264), buried at Westminster Abbey.
  • Joanna (Summer or January 1265 – earlier than 7 September 1265), buried in Westminster Abbey.
  • John (13 July 1266 – 3 August 1271), predeceased his father and died at Wallingford whereas within the custody of his granduncle Richard, Earl of Cornwall; buried at Westminster Abbey.
  • Henry (6 May 1268 – 14 October 1274), predeceased his father, buried in Westminster Abbey.
  • Eleanor (c. 18 June 1269 – 19 August 1298); in 1293 she married Henry III, Count of Bar, by whom she had two kids, buried in Westminster Abbey.
  • Juliana (after May 1271 – 5 September 1271), born and died whereas Edward and Eleanor have been in Acre.
  • Joan of Acre (1272 – 23 April 1307), married (1) in 1290 Gilbert de Clare, sixth Earl of Hertford, who died in 1295, and (2) in 1297 Ralph de Monthermer. She had 4 kids by Clare, and three or 4 by Monthermer.
  • Alphonso, Earl of Chester (24 November 1273 – 19 August 1284), predeceased his father, buried in Westminster Abbey.
  • Margaret (c.15 March 1275 – after 11 March 1333), married John II of Brabant in 1290, with whom she had one son.
  • Berengaria (May 1276 – between 7 June 1277 and 1278), buried in Westminster Abbey.
  • Daughter (December 1277 – January 1278), buried in Westminster Abbey.
  • Mary of Woodstock (11 March 1278[258] – earlier than 8 July 1332[259]), a Benedictine nun in Amesbury Priory, Wiltshire, the place she was most likely buried.
  • Son (1280/81 – 1280/81), predeceased his father; little proof exists for this youngster.
  • Elizabeth of Rhuddlan (c. 7 August 1282 – 5 May 1316), married (1) in 1297 John I, Count of Holland, (2) in 1302 Humphrey de Bohun, 4th Earl of Hereford. The first marriage was childless; by Bohun she had ten kids.
  • Edward II (25 April 1284 – 21 September 1327), succeeded his father as king of England. In 1308 he married Isabella of France, with whom he had 4 kids.

Second marriage[edit]

By Margaret of France, Edward had two sons, each of whom lived to maturity, and a daughter who died as a baby. The Hailes Abbey chronicle signifies that John Botetourt could have been Edward’s illegitimate son; nevertheless, the declare is unsubstantiated.[260] His progeny by Margaret of France have been:

Genealogical desk[edit]

Edward I’s relationship to the up to date leaders in Britain[264]

See additionally[edit]

  1. ^ As the sources give the time merely because the evening between the 17 and 18 June, we can’t know the precise date of Edward’s delivery.[3]
  2. ^ Regnal numbers weren’t generally utilized in Edward’s time;[5] he was referred to easily as “King Edward” or “King Edward, son of King Henry”. It was solely after the succession of first his son after which his grandson—each of whom bore the identical title—that “Edward I” got here into frequent utilization.[4]
  3. ^ Henry III’s mom Isabella of Angoulême married Hugh X of Lusignan after the demise of King John of England.[19]
  4. ^ The Dictum restored land to the disinherited rebels, in change for a nice determined by their stage of involvement within the wars.[43]
  5. ^ The important concession was that the disinherited would now be allowed to take possession of their lands earlier than paying the fines.[44]
  6. ^ This meant a grant of 1/20 of all movable property.
  7. ^ The illness in query was both dysentery or typhus.[52]
  8. ^ The anecdote of Queen Eleanor saving Edward’s life by sucking the poison out of his wound is sort of actually a later fabrication.[61] Other accounts of the scene have Eleanor being led away weeping by John de Vescy, and recommend that it was one other of Edward’s shut mates, Otto de Grandson, who tried to suck the poison from the wound.[60]
  9. ^ Though no written proof exists, it’s assumed that this association was agreed on earlier than Edward’s departure.[65]
  10. ^ Lancaster’s submit was held by Payne de Chaworth till April.[74]
  11. ^ This title grew to become the normal title of the inheritor obvious to the English throne. Prince Edward was not born inheritor obvious, however grew to become so when his older brother Alphonso, Earl of Chester, died in 1284.[98]
  12. ^ Prestwich estimates the overall value to be round £400,000.[110]
  13. ^ The time period is an 18th-century invention.[118]
  14. ^ Even although the precept of primogeniture didn’t essentially apply to descent via feminine heirs, there may be little doubt that Balliol’s declare was the strongest one.[124]
  15. ^ The few surviving paperwork from the Hundred Rolls present the huge scope of the challenge. They are handled extensively in: Helen Cam (1963). The Hundred and the Hundred Rolls: An Outline of Local Government in Medieval England (New ed.). London: Merlin Press.
  16. ^ Among these singled out specifically by the royal justices was Gilbert de Clare, sixth Earl of Hertford, who was seen to have encroached ruthlessly on royal rights over the previous years.[147]
  17. ^ The time period was first launched by William Stubbs.[181]
  18. ^ Winchelsey’s consecration was held up by the protracted 1292–1294 papal election.[185]
  19. ^ A full textual content of the constitution, with extra data, will be discovered at: Jones, Graham. “The Charter of the Forest of King Henry III”. St John’s College, Oxford. Retrieved 17 July 2009..
  20. ^ The authentic report will be present in Ayloffe, J. (1786). “An Account of the Body of King Edward the First, as it appeared on opening his Tomb in the year 1774”. Archaeologia. iii: 386, 398–412..
  21. ^ G. Templeman argued in his 1950 historiographical essay that “it is generally recognized that Edward I deserves a high place in the history of medieval England”.[245] More just lately, Michael Prestwich argues that “Edward was a formidable king; his reign, with both its successes and its disappointments, a great one,” and he was “without doubt one of the greatest rulers of his time”, whereas John Gillingham means that “no king of England had a greater impact on the peoples of Britain than Edward I” and that “modern historians of the English state… have always recognized Edward I’s reign as pivotal.”[246] Fred Cazel equally feedback that “no-one can doubt the greatness of the reign”.[247] Most just lately, Andrew Spencer has agreed with Prestwich, arguing that Edward’s reign “was indeed… a great one”, and Caroline Burt states that “Edward I was without a doubt one of the greatest kings to rule England”[248]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Morris 2009, p. 22
  2. ^ a b Morris 2009, p. 2
  3. ^ a b Carpenter, David (2007). “King Henry III and Saint Edward the Confessor: the origins of the cult”. English Historical Review. cxxii (498): 865–91. doi:10.1093/ehr/cem214.
  4. ^ Morris 2009, pp. xv–xvi
  5. ^ a b Prestwich 1997, p. 6
  6. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 46, 69
  7. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 5–6
  8. ^ a b Prestwich 2007, p. 177
  9. ^ Prestwich 2008
  10. ^ Morris 2009, pp. 14–18
  11. ^ Morris 2009, p. 20
  12. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 10
  13. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 7–8
  14. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 11–14
  15. ^ Prestwich 2007, p. 96
  16. ^ Morris 2009, p. 7
  17. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 22–23
  18. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 21
  19. ^ Prestwich 2007, p. 95
  20. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 23
  21. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 15–16
  22. ^ Carpenter 1985
  23. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 31–32
  24. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 32–33
  25. ^ Morris 2009, pp. 44–45
  26. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 34
  27. ^ Powicke 1962, pp. 171–172
  28. ^ Maddicott 1994, p. 225
  29. ^ Powicke 1962, pp. 178
  30. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 41
  31. ^ Prestwich 2007, p. 113
  32. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 42–43
  33. ^ Sadler 2008, pp. 55–69
  34. ^ Maddicott 1983, pp. 592–599
  35. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 47–48
  36. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 48–49
  37. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 49–50
  38. ^ Powicke 1962, pp. 201–202
  39. ^ Sadler 2008, pp. 105–109
  40. ^ Morris 2009, pp. 75–76
  41. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 55
  42. ^ a b Prestwich 2007, p. 117
  43. ^ a b Prestwich 2007, p. 121
  44. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 63
  45. ^ Morris 2009, pp. 83, 90–92
  46. ^ a b Prestwich 1997, p. 71
  47. ^ a b Prestwich 1997, p. 72
  48. ^ Maddicott 1989, pp. 107–110
  49. ^ Morris 2009, p. 92
  50. ^ Riley-Smith 2005, p. 210
  51. ^ Riley-Smith 2005, pp. 210–211
  52. ^ Riley-Smith 2005, p. 211
  53. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 75
  54. ^ Morris 2009, p. 95
  55. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 76
  56. ^ Avner Falk, Franks and Saracens: Reality and Fantasy within the Crusades, Jul 2010, p. 192
  57. ^ Morris 2009, pp. 97–98
  58. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 77
  59. ^ a b Morris 2009, p. 101
  60. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 78
  61. ^ Slack, Corliss (2009). The A to Z of the Crusades. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 36. ISBN 978-0-8108-6815-1.
  62. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 78, 82
  63. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 82
  64. ^ a b Morris 2009, p. 104
  65. ^ Carpenter 2004, p. 466
  66. ^ Powicke 1962, p. 226
  67. ^ Carpenter 2004, p. 386
  68. ^ Morris 2009, p. 132
  69. ^ Davies 2000, pp. 322–323
  70. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 175
  71. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 174–175
  72. ^ Davies 2000, p. 327
  73. ^ a b c Powicke 1962, p. 409
  74. ^ Prestwich 2007, p. 150
  75. ^ a b Prestwich 2007, p. 151
  76. ^ Powicke 1962, p. 413
  77. ^ Davies, Rees (1984). “Law and national identity in thirteenth century Wales”. In R. R. Davies; R. A. Griffiths; I. G. Jones; Ok. O. Morgan (eds.). Welsh Society and Nationhood. Cardiff: University of Wales Press. pp. 51–69. ISBN 0-7083-0890-2.
  78. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 188
  79. ^ Davies 2000, p. 348
  80. ^ Morris 2009, p. 180
  81. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 191–192
  82. ^ Davies 2000, p. 353
  83. ^ Carpenter 2004, p. 510
  84. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 218–220
  85. ^ Carpenter 2004, p. 511
  86. ^ Davies 2000, p. 368
  87. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 216
  88. ^ Lilley 2010, pp. 104–106
  89. ^ Coldstream 2010, pp. 39–40
  90. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 160; Brears 2010, p. 86
  91. ^ Cathcart King 1988, p. 84
  92. ^ Cathcart King 1988, p. 83; Friar 2003, p. 77
  93. ^ Prestwich 2010, p. 6; Wheatley 2010, pp. 129, 136
  94. ^ Phillips 2011, pp. 35–36; Haines 2003, p. 3
  95. ^ Phillips 2011, p. 36; Haines 2003, pp. 3–4
  96. ^ a b Phillips 2011, pp. 85–87; Phillips, J. R. S. (2008). “Edward II (Edward of Caernarfon) (1284–1327), king of England and lord of Ireland, and duke of Aquitaine”. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (on-line ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/8518. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  97. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 126–127
  98. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 326–328
  99. ^ Powicke 1962, pp. 252–253
  100. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 323–325
  101. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 329
  102. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 304
  103. ^ Morris 2009, pp. 204–217
  104. ^ Morris 2009, pp. 265–270
  105. ^ Morris 2009, pp. 230–231
  106. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 395–396
  107. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 387–390
  108. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 392
  109. ^ a b Prestwich 1972, p. 172
  110. ^ Carpenter 2004, p. 518
  111. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 357
  112. ^ Barrow 1965, pp. 3–4
  113. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 361
  114. ^ Morris 2009, p. 235
  115. ^ Barrow 1965, p. 42
  116. ^ Morris 2009, p. 237
  117. ^ a b Morris 2009, p. 253
  118. ^ Prestwich 2007, p. 231
  119. ^ Powicke 1962, p. 601
  120. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 361–363
  121. ^ Barrow 1965, p. 45
  122. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 365
  123. ^ a b Prestwich 1997, pp. 358, 367
  124. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 370
  125. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 371
  126. ^ Barrow 1965, pp. 86–8
  127. ^ Barrow 1965, pp. 88–91, 99
  128. ^ Barrow 1965, pp. 99–100
  129. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 471–473
  130. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 473–474
  131. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 376
  132. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 552
  133. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 24
  134. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 559
  135. ^ Prestwich 2003, pp. 37–38
  136. ^ Prestwich 2003, pp. 33–34
  137. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 112–113
  138. ^ Raban 2000, p. 140; Prestwich 2003, p. 34
  139. ^ Morris 2009, p. 192; Prestwich 1997, pp. 120–121
  140. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 120–121; Loomis 1953, pp. 125–127
  141. ^ Morris 2009, pp. 164–166; Prestwich 1997, pp. 121–122
  142. ^ Morris 2009, pp. 116–117
  143. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 92
  144. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 93
  145. ^ Morris 2009, p. 115
  146. ^ a b Sutherland 1963, pp. 146–147
  147. ^ Sutherland 1963, p. 14
  148. ^ Powicke 1962, pp. 378–379
  149. ^ Sutherland 1963, p. 188
  150. ^ Sutherland 1963, p. 149
  151. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 267
  152. ^ Brand, Paul (2003). Kings, Barons and Justices: The Making and Enforcement of Legislation in Thirteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-37246-1.
  153. ^ Plucknett 1949, pp. 29–30
  154. ^ Plucknett 1949, pp. 94–98
  155. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 273
  156. ^ Plucknett 1949, pp. 140–144
  157. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 280–1
  158. ^ Plucknett 1949, pp. 45, 102–104
  159. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 293
  160. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. plate 14
  161. ^ Harriss 1975, p. 49
  162. ^ Brown 1989, pp. 65–66
  163. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 99–100
  164. ^ Brown 1989, pp. 80–81
  165. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 403
  166. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 344
  167. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 344–345
  168. ^ Morris 2009, p. 86
  169. ^ Powicke 1962, p. 322
  170. ^ Morris 2009, pp. 170–171
  171. ^ a b Morris 2009, p. 226
  172. ^ Morris 2009, pp. 226–228
  173. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 345; Powicke 1962, p. 513
  174. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 346
  175. ^ Powicke 1962, p. 342
  176. ^ Brown 1989, p. 185
  177. ^ Harriss 1975, pp. 41–42
  178. ^ Brown 1989, pp. 70–71
  179. ^ Brown 1989, p. 71
  180. ^ a b Morris 2009, pp. 283–284
  181. ^ Prestwich 1972, p. 179
  182. ^ Harriss 1975, p. 57
  183. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 403–404
  184. ^ a b Powicke 1962, p. 671
  185. ^ Powicke 1962, p. 674
  186. ^ Powicke 1962, p. 675
  187. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 417
  188. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 430
  189. ^ Harry Rothwell, ed. (1957). The chronicle of Walter of Guisborough. 89. London: Camden Society. pp. 289–90. Quoted in Prestwich 1997, p. 416
  190. ^ Prestwich 1972, p. 251
  191. ^ Harriss 1975, p. 61.
  192. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 422
  193. ^ Powicke 1962, p. 682
  194. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 425
  195. ^ Powicke 1962, p. 683
  196. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 427
  197. ^ Prestwich 2007, p. 170
  198. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 525–526, 547–548
  199. ^ Powicke 1962, p. 697
  200. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 537–538
  201. ^ Prestwich 2007, p. 175
  202. ^ Barrow 1965, pp. 123–126
  203. ^ Powicke 1962, pp. 688–689
  204. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 479
  205. ^ Watson 1998, pp. 92–93
  206. ^ Prestwich 2007, p. 233
  207. ^ Prestwich 2007, p. 497
  208. ^ Prestwich 2007, p. 496
  209. ^ Powicke 1962, pp. 709–711
  210. ^ Watson 1998, p. 211
  211. ^ Powicke 1962, pp. 711–713
  212. ^ Barrow 1965, pp. 206–207, 212–213
  213. ^ Prestwich 2007, p. 506
  214. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 506–507
  215. ^ Barrow 1965, p. 216
  216. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 507–508
  217. ^ Education Scotland, “Elizabeth de Burgh and Marjorie Bruce” Archived 11 July 2015 on the Wayback Machine, Education Scotland (a Scottish authorities company, “the national body in Scotland for supporting quality and improvement in learning and teaching”). Retrieved 11 July 2015.
  218. ^ David Cornell, “Bannockburn: The Triumph of Robert the Bruce”, Yale University Press,, 2009. Retrieved 11 July 2015.
  219. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 508–509
  220. ^ Prestwich 2007, p. 239
  221. ^ Barrow 1965, p. 244
  222. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 556–557
  223. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 557
  224. ^ Morris 2009, p. 377
  225. ^ Barrow 1965, p. 246
  226. ^ Prestwich 2007, p. 179
  227. ^ a b Duffy 2003, p. 96
  228. ^ Duffy 2003, pp. 96–98
  229. ^ Duffy 2003, p. 98
  230. ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 566–567
  231. ^ Morris 2009, p. 378; Duffy 2003, p. 97
  232. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 566; Duffy 2003, p. 97
  233. ^ Templeman 1950, pp. 16–18
  234. ^ Templeman 1950, pp. 16–18; Morris 2009, pp. 364–365
  235. ^ Templeman 1950, p. 17
  236. ^ Templeman 1950, p. 18
  237. ^ Templeman 1950, pp. 21–22
  238. ^ Stubbs 1880; Templeman 1950, p. 22
  239. ^ Burt 2013, p. 2
  240. ^ Templeman 1950, pp. 25–26
  241. ^ Templeman 1950, p. 25; Tout 1920, p. 190
  242. ^ Burt 2013, p. 1
  243. ^ Templeman 1950, p. 16; Prestwich 1997, p. 567; Prestwich 2003, p. 38; Gillingham, John (11 July 2008), “Hard on Wales”, Times Literary Supplement, Times Literary Supplement, retrieved 26 June 2014; Cazel 1991, p. 225; Spencer 2014, p. 265; Burt 2013, pp. 1–3
  244. ^ Templeman 1950, p. 16
  245. ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 567; Prestwich 2003, p. 38; Gillingham, John (11 July 2008), “Hard on Wales”, Times Literary Supplement, Times Literary Supplement, retrieved 26 June 2014
  246. ^ Cazel 1991, p. 225
  247. ^ Spencer 2014, p. 265; Burt 2013, pp. 1–3
  248. ^ Morris 2009, p. viii; Burt 2013, p. 1; Spencer 2014, p. 4
  249. ^ Powicke 1947; Powicke 1962; Burt 2013, p. 2; Cazel 1991, p. 225
  250. ^ Prestwich 1997; Denton 1989, p. 982; Cazel 1991, p. 225; Carpenter 2004, p. 566
  251. ^ Morris 2009; Burt 2013, p. 1; Goldsmith, Jeremy (January 2009), “A Great and Terrible King: Edward I and the Forging of Britain”, Reviews in History, University of London, ISSN 1749-8155, retrieved 29 June 2014
  252. ^ McFarlane 1981, p. 267; Burt 2013, pp. 7–8
  253. ^ Barrow 1965, p. 44
  254. ^ Barron, Evan Macleod (1914). The Scottish War of Independence. USA: Barnes & Noble. p. 87.
  255. ^ Powicke 1962, p. 719
  256. ^ The data on Edward’s kids with Eleanor is predicated on Parsons, John Carmi (1984). “The Year of Eleanor of Castile’s Birth and her Children by Edward I”. Medieval Studies. XLVI: 245–65. doi:10.1484/J.MS.2.306316.
  257. ^ Burke’s information to the Royal Family (1 ed.). London, Burke’s Peerage. 1973. pp. 197. ISBN 9780220662226.
  258. ^ Weir, Alison (1999). Britain’s Royal Families: The Complete Genealogy. London, U.Ok.: The Bodley Head. p. 85. ISBN 978-0099539735.
  259. ^ Gorski, Richard (2009). “Botetourt, John, first Lord Botetourt (d. 1324)”. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (on-line ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/2966. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  260. ^ Waugh, Scott L. (2004). “Thomas, 1st Earl of Norfolk (1300–1338)”. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (on-line ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/27196. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  261. ^ Waugh, Scott L. (2004). “Edmund, first earl of Kent (1301–1330)”. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (on-line ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/8506. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  262. ^ Parsons, John Carmi (2008). “Margaret (1279?–1318)”. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (on-line ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/18046. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  263. ^ Prestwich 2008, p. 572-573

Bibliography[edit]

  • Barrow, G. W. S. (1965). Robert Bruce and the Community of the Realm of Scotland. London, UK: Eyre and Spottiswoode. OCLC 655056131.
  • Brears, Peter (2010). “Food Supply and Preparation at the Edwardian Castles”. In Williams, Diane; Kenyon, John (eds.). The Impact of Edwardian Castles in Wales. Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books. pp. 85–98. ISBN 978-1-84217-380-0.
  • Brown, A.L. (1989). The Governance of Late Medieval England 1272–1461. London, UK: Edward Arnold. ISBN 0-8047-1730-3.
  • Burt, Caroline (2013). Edward I and the Governance of England, 1272–1307. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521889995.
  • Carpenter, David (1985). “The Lord Edward’s oath to aid and counsel Simon de Montfort, 15 October 1259”. Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research. 58 (138): 226–37. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2281.1985.tb01170.x.
  • Carpenter, David (2004). The Struggle for Mastery: Britain, 1066–1284. London, UK: Penguin Books. ISBN 9780140148244.
  • Cathcart King, David James (1988). The Castle in England and Wales: An Interpretative History. London, UK: Croom Helm. ISBN 0-918400-08-2.
  • Cazel, Fred A. (1991). “Edward I, by Michael Prestwich”. Speculum. 66 (1): 225–227. doi:10.2307/2864011. JSTOR 2864011.
  • Coldstream, Nicola (2010). “James of St George”. In Williams, Diane; Kenyon, John (eds.). The Impact of Edwardian Castles in Wales. Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books. pp. 37–45. ISBN 978-1-84217-380-0.
  • Davies, R. R. (2000). The Age of Conquest: Wales, 1063–1415. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-820878-2.
  • Denton, J. H. (1989). “Edward I by Michael Prestwich”. The English Historical Review. 104 (413): 981–984. doi:10.1093/ehr/CIV.413.981.
  • Duffy, Mark (2003). Royal Tombs of Medieval England. Stroud, UK: Tempus. ISBN 978-0-7524-2579-5.
  • Friar, Stephen (2003). The Sutton Companion to Castles. Stroud, UK: Sutton Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7509-3994-2.
  • Haines, Roy Martin (2003). King Edward II: His Life, his Reign and its Aftermath, 1284–1330. Montreal, Canada and Kingston, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press. ISBN 978-0-7735-3157-4.
  • Harriss, G.L. (1975). King, Parliament and Public Finance in Medieval England to 1369. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-822435-4.
  • Lilley, Keith D. (2010). “The Landscapes of Edward’s New Towns: Their Planning and Design”. In Williams, Diane; Kenyon, John (eds.). The Impact of Edwardian Castles in Wales. Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books. pp. 99–113. ISBN 978-1-84217-380-0.
  • Lloyd, Simon (1986). “Gilbert de Clare, Richard of Cornwall and the Lord Edward’s Crusade”. Nottingham Medieval Studies. 30: 46–66. doi:10.1484/J.NMS.3.133.
  • Loomis, Roger Sherman (1953). “Edward I, Arthurian Enthusiast”. Speculum. 28 (1): 114–127. doi:10.2307/2847184. JSTOR 2847184. S2CID 164043032.
  • Maddicott, John (1983). “The Mise of Lewes, 1264”. English Historical Review. 98 (338): 588–603. doi:10.1093/ehr/xcviii.ccclxxxviii.588.
  • Maddicott, John (1989). “The Crusade Taxation of 1268–70 and the Development of Parliament”. In P. R. Coss; S. D. Lloyd (eds.). Thirteenth Century England. 2. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell Press. pp. 93–117. ISBN 0-85115-513-8.
  • Maddicott, John (1994). Simon de Montfort. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-37493-6.
  • McFarlane, Ok. B. (1981). The Nobility of Later Medieval England. London, UK: Hambledon. ISBN 0-9506882-5-8.
  • Morris, John E. (1901). The Welsh Wars of Edward I. a Contribution to Mediaeval Military History, Based on Original Documents. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. OCLC 562375464.
  • Morris, Marc (2009). A Great and Terrible King: Edward I and the Forging of Britain. London, UK: Windmill Books. ISBN 978-0-09-948175-1.
  • Neal, Kathleen B. (2021). The Letters of Edward I: Political Communication within the Thirteenth Century. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell Press. ISBN 978-1-78-327415-4.
  • Phillips, Seymour (2011). Edward II. New Haven, US and London, UK: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-17802-9.
  • Plucknett, Theodore Frank Thomas (1949). Legislation of Edward I. Oxford, UK: The Clarendon Press. OCLC 983476.
  • Powicke, F. M. (1947). King Henry III and the Lord Edward: The Community of the Realm within the Thirteenth Century. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. OCLC 1044503.
  • Powicke, F. M. (1962). The Thirteenth Century, 1216–1307 (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. OCLC 3693188.
  • Prestwich, Michael (1972). War, Politics and Finance below Edward I. London, UK: Faber and Faber. ISBN 0-571-09042-7.
  • Prestwich, Michael (1997). Edward I (Yale ed.). New Haven, US: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-07209-0.
  • Prestwich, Michael (2003). The Three Edwards: War and State in England, 1272–1377 (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge. ISBN 9780415303095.
  • Prestwich, Michael (2007). Plantagenet England: 1225–1360 (new ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-822844-8.
  • Prestwich, Michael (2008). “Edward I (1239–1307)”. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/8517. ISBN 978-0-19-861412-8. Retrieved 28 February 2019. (subscription or UK public library membership required)
  • Prestwich, Michael (2010). “Edward I and Wales”. In Williams, Diane; Kenyon, John (eds.). The Impact of Edwardian Castles in Wales. Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books. pp. 1–8. ISBN 978-1-84217-380-0.
  • Raban, Sandra (2000). England Under Edward I and Edward II, 1259–1327. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. ISBN 9780631223207.
  • Riley-Smith, Jonathan (2005). The Crusades: A History. London: Continuum. ISBN 0-8264-7269-9.
  • Sadler, John (2008). The Second Barons’ War: Simon de Montfort and the Battles of Lewes and Evesham. Barnsley, UK: Pen and Sword Military. ISBN 978-1-84415-831-7.
  • Spencer, Andrew (2014). Nobility and Kingship in Medieval England: The Earls and Edward I, 1272–1307. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781107026759.
  • Stubbs, William (1880). The Constitutional History of England. 2. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
  • Sutherland, Donald (1963). Quo Warranto Proceedings within the Reign of Edward I, 1278–1294. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. OCLC 408401.
  • Templeman, G. (1950). “Edward I and the Historians”. Cambridge Historical Journal. 10 (1): 16–35. doi:10.1017/S1474691300002663. JSTOR 3021067.
  • Tout, Thomas Frederick (1920). Chapters within the Administrative History of Mediaeval England: The Wardrobe, the Chamber and the Small Seals. 2. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press. OCLC 832154714.
  • Watson, G.W. (1895). “The Seize Quartiers of the Kings and Queens of England”. In H.W. Forsyth Harwood (ed.). The Genealogist. New Series. 11. Exeter: William Pollard & Co.
  • Watson, Fiona J. (1998). Under the Hammer: Edward I and the Throne of Scotland, 1286–1307. East Linton: Tuckwell Press. ISBN 1-86232-031-4.
  • Wheatley, Abigail (2010). “Caernarfon Castle and its Mythology”. In Williams, Diane; Kenyon, John (eds.). The Impact of Edwardian Castles in Wales. Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books. pp. 129–139. ISBN 978-1-84217-380-0.

External hyperlinks[edit]


READ:   4 Loan Forgiveness Programs for Teachers